Verdict
CONSENSUS 2/3 · LOW
When total calories and protein are matched, intermittent fasting is not clearly superior to continuous caloric restriction for weight loss.
Question
Is intermittent fasting better than caloric restriction?
Dissent
google · fixture-google · IT DEPENDS
Some people lose more with fasting due to easier adherence.
The crux
Whether timing-specific metabolic benefits remain after equating energy intake.
By model
Slot 1 · openaifixture-openaiNO
- Matched-calorie trials usually show similar weight loss.
Evidence syntheses find similar fat loss when calories are equated.
Slot 2 · anthropicfixture-anthropicNO
- Adherence differences matter more than protocol labels.
Any average edge is small and inconsistent across populations.
Slot 3 · googlefixture-googleIT DEPENDS · dissent
- Some people lose more with fasting due to easier adherence.
If fasting improves adherence for a person, it can outperform on that path.
Limitations
Model agreement is not medical advice and does not establish individual outcomes.
2026-08-01T12:00:00Z · schema 1.0 · nutrition · public_atlas
This demo compares public-purpose questions across hosted third-party models. A Consensus Card compares model outputs; agreement does not guarantee truth. Korvo desktop runs consensus on your documents, on your machine, with your keys — and your workspace data stays under your control.